Nintendo Wii forums Forum for writers phpBB mods Essays on copyright Dating advice Narnia forums

Greasemonkey script: Digg Done That

In the blog comments for my other Greasemonkey script, Alex requested that I create a script that would allow him to mark Digg stores as "read."  Doing this would make the story disappear, so that the only stories showing on the page would be the ones still unread.  It took months for me to find some free time, but I finally made the script.  Here's a screenshot of what it adds to digg.com stories:

screenshot of Digg Done That in action

Installation

If you're interested in using this script, you need to have the Greasemonkey plug-in installed in your Firefox browser.  If you've got that working, head over to userscripts.org and use the install button on the right side of the page.

Digg Done That?

Yeah, as in, "Been there, done that." It's what I mutter to myself as I'm clicking stories into oblivion. :)

I removed a bunch of stories that I want back!

If you remove some stories by mistake, you can get them to display again.  On digg.com, go to your profile ("My Profile" near the top of the page), then select the Settings tab (shown in the following screenshot).  On your settings page, you'll see an option to "Clear your read stories."  Select that and your list will be reset.

screenshot of Digg Done That settings

I don't want to undelete every story!

OK.  You can click the Greasemonkey icon at the bottom of your Firefox window to temporarily disable scripts.  Reload digg.com.  That will allow you to view the stories again, but it will preserve your list.  Click the Greasemonkey icon again to turn scripts back on.

Any tips?

Yeah.  I'm not sure what Firefox will do once a digg.com reader has marked thousands of stories as read.  For each story to hide, we have to save the story's ID.  That could end up as a massive amount of data (relatively speaking) that slows the browser.  So what I do is limit it to the 250 most recent IDs.  That should keep things snappy, but it may mean that really old stories (buried on page 50 or something) eventually reappear.  Hopefully you won't notice or care.  :)

Have fun!

Navigate

« The National Debt for the USA, by year | Main | Barack Obama, Jeremiah Wright »

Nav by tag: greasemonkey
« Greasemonkey Digg Filter | Main | Greasemonkey: PHP multi-byte string warnings »
Nav by tag: tech
« Updated The Blog Mod for phpBB 2.x | Main | Greasemonkey: PHP multi-byte string warnings »
Bookmark It! Technorati del.icio.us Netvouz DZone ThisNext Wists blinkbits BlinkList blogmarks blogtercimlap Blue Dot Bumpzee co.mments connotea DotNetKicks Fark feedmelinks Fleck Furl Gwar Haohao Hemidemi IndiaGram IndianPad Internetmedia kick.ie LinkaGoGo Linkter Ma.gnolia MyShare Netscape NewsVine PlugIM PopCurrent ppnow RawSugar Reddit Shadows Simpy Slashdot Smarking Spurl Webride YahooMyWeb
TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.outshine.com/cgi-bin/outshine/trackback.cgi/59

Comments (14)
dogsbollox88@gmail.com writes:

What would be the most awesome digg script ever and would save the site is an auto bury script for top diggers ...... return it to being actual social voting


erichansa writes:

wow, what a cool tool


Deep writes:

Pros: I have mixed feelings about this lotpap. On the Pro side it is very light (too light in my opinion, the plastic looks and feels cheap), very quiet, very cool, and the build quality is high. The LED screen is superior to my old lotpap with a standard backlit screen. The keyboard is very nice and I like the feel of the keys.On the performance side, this machine is very fast and rates equal to or better than all the other Core i3 systems I browsed at a retail store before ordering this one from Newegg. I am still shocked that Intel has actually built a respectable graphics chip into the Core i series. It is adequate to all but dedicated gaming. This is my first non-AMD lotpap in quite a while, primarily because the ATI graphics on AMD systems are typically much better than the integrated Intel graphics. Cons: On the Con side I have quite a few complaints and concerns. First, I hate the silver surfaces on this lotpap. They don't look like the pictures. The cover and wrist rest are very bright and reflective and show every fingerprint. I'm not a stickler for the fingerprint issue as many are but on this is insane. The glossy surface looks and feels cheap. In fact you can push in on the cover, it does not feel rigid at all.While build quality is high I feel that the materials used look and feel cheap (pretty much all plastic case) and I am concerned they will not hold up to abuse. Honestly I would be very happy if it were not for the plastic casing. Because of this I would return it if I could. Other Thoughts: I had the same issue as Nate below with Windows 7 SP1. I fixed the issue by downloading the latest Intel Graphics driver package from the Intel site and uninstalling the current driver, rebooting, and then installing the new driver. After doing this I was able to get SP1 from Windows Update and install it successfully. I have seen no lockups or performance problems.As others mentioned besides some games and security software there is very little bloatware to uninstall.


I read your post and wished I'd written it


That's a well-thought-out answer to a challenging question


Cheers pal. I do appreciate the writing.


We need a lot more insights like this!


Haha, shouldn't you be charging for that kind of knowledge?!


Gee willikers, that's such a great post!


You've captured this perfectly. Thanks for taking the time!


Why does this have to be the ONLY reliable source? Oh well, gj!


QuotesChimp writes:

Slam dunkin like Shaquille O'Neal, if he wrote informative articles.


You make things so clear. Thanks for taking the time!


I am forever indebted to you for this information.


Post a comment

Verification (needed to reduce spam):